<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Timesnapper Can Assist Your Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottfillmer.com/2008/04/18/timesnapper-helps-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottfillmer.com/2008/04/18/timesnapper-helps-blogging/</link>
	<description>Life in Faith &#38; Photos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:05:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.scottfillmer.com/2008/04/18/timesnapper-helps-blogging/#comment-3328</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 22:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.islandzephyr.com/?p=5#comment-3328</guid>
		<description>If you need a similar program that can also upload the screenshot to an FTP server and run in a hidden-mode, I recommend AutoScreen (I don&#039;t know if links work here: http://www.16software.com/autoscreen). It doesn&#039;t have the advanced &#039;Productivity Calculator&#039;/playback features that TimeSnapper has, but consequently it&#039;s cheaper. It also has better multiple-monitor support (such as capturing only certain areas of the screen/scaling certain screens and not others).

Both are interesting products that have unique strengths, though. It&#039;s interesting how useful screenshots can be... Good article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you need a similar program that can also upload the screenshot to an FTP server and run in a hidden-mode, I recommend AutoScreen (I don&#8217;t know if links work here: <a href="http://www.16software.com/autoscreen" rel="nofollow">http://www.16software.com/autoscreen</a>). It doesn&#8217;t have the advanced &#8216;Productivity Calculator&#8217;/playback features that TimeSnapper has, but consequently it&#8217;s cheaper. It also has better multiple-monitor support (such as capturing only certain areas of the screen/scaling certain screens and not others).</p>
<p>Both are interesting products that have unique strengths, though. It&#8217;s interesting how useful screenshots can be&#8230; Good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

